Canadian Health Information Management Association Practice Exam 2025 - Free CHIMA Practice Questions and Study Guide

The correct term to describe a process where coders review records done by their peers is interrater reliability. This concept refers to the degree of agreement or consistency between different individuals (raters) assessing the same data or records. In the context of coding, it is essential to ensure that multiple coders yield consistent results when interpreting and coding health records.

Interrater reliability is increasingly important in health information management and medical coding, as it helps identify discrepancies in the coding process and ensures standardized practices. When coders review each other's work, it fosters a collaborative environment that enhances the accuracy and reliability of coding outcomes.

In contrast, intrarater validity and reliability focus on the consistency of a single rater over time or different instances. While understanding these concepts is crucial, they do not apply in the scenario of peer review being discussed. Thus, interrater reliability is specifically appropriate for describing the process of coders reviewing each other’s records.